Our class discussion about the fairness of the college application process is a parallel argument to the question of whether or not the economic success or failure of a state is a fair outcome. Ultimately, the answer is that it is irrelevant because fairness is too vague and subjective of a term, and regardless of whether one considers it to be fair or not, we should focus on how to uplift states who struggle in order to create a better, more efficient global structure. Theoretically, when you work hard to build a stellar college application consisting of various components, you should get into a good school. However, this is not always the case. Today, there are simply too many college applicants for schools to accept. Therefore, the best colleges are forced to cut people for reasons beyond the power of the students such as geographical location, and ethnicity. In the book “Outliers,” author Matthew Gladwell suggests that universities should instead make two separate piles of applicants: good enough, and not good enough. They should then essentially pick names out of a hat from the “good enough” pile in order to create the most balanced system of choosing its incoming freshmen. However, since that is not the case, we are taught to work around the system. College counselors tell their students to apply to many different schools including safety schools, and to manipulate their applications to make them stand out among thousands. In today’s world, it’s more about standing out instead of having a perfect application.
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Blog #12: Life's not fair.
Labels:
Aditi Harsh
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment